Friday, April 19, 2024

Insolvency Service bans more directors for abuse of Covid support schemes

The Insolvency Service is now banning an average of 35 directors a month for Covid Support Scheme abuse, almost three times the 12 per month banned in the previous year, according to new data from international tax, audit, and advisory firm Mazars.

Between April and December last year, 312 company directors were banned from running businesses for abuse of Covid support schemes, compared to 141 in the whole year from April 1 2021 to March 31 2022.

Over the same period, the average length of director bans has also increased by 22%, from 5.9 years to 7.2 years. Directors disqualified (ie prevented from taking the role of a director) in December 2022 received bans of eight years on average.

The increase in the number of director disqualifications, combined with longer bans, suggests that the Insolvency Service is accelerating its enforcement activity in relation to Covid fraud.

Michael Pallott,  Partner and Head of Contentious Insolvency at Mazars says: “The Insolvency Service has stepped up a gear in its pursuit and punishment of those directors responsible for Covid fraud. That’s something that all taxpayers will be pleased to see.

“Without tough action from the Insolvency Service and other enforcement agencies there will be little to deter directors from continuing to abuse the system.

“The harsher penalties for directors seen over recent months suggest that the Insolvency Service is looking to send a clear message to directors who misused taxpayers’ money during the pandemic.

“Directors are far more likely to commit financial misconduct during times of economic stress, when the survival of their business may be at stake. However, this does not excuse fraudulent activity, which many directors who bent the rules during the pandemic are now finding out to their cost.

“Directors who are concerned that they may have broken any rules relating to Covid support schemes would be best advised to come forward as soon as possible, as it’s always better to be upfront about potential misconduct rather than to be found out.”

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this story on our news site - please take a moment to read this important message:

As you know, our aim is to bring you, the reader, an editorially led news site and magazine but journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them.

With the Covid-19 pandemichaving a major impact on our industry as a whole, the advertising revenues we normally receive, which helps us cover the cost of our journalists and this website, have been drastically affected.

As such we need your help. If you can support our news sites/magazines with either a small donation of even £1, or a subscription to our magazine, which costs just £31.50 per year, (inc p&P and mailed direct to your door) your generosity will help us weather the storm and continue in our quest to deliver quality journalism.

As a subscriber, you will have unlimited access to our web site and magazine. You'll also be offered VIP invitations to our events, preferential rates to all our awards and get access to exclusive newsletters and content.

Just click here to subscribe and in the meantime may I wish you the very best.








Latest news

Related news