Tuesday, July 1, 2025

Pension reforms risk higher prices, fewer jobs and slower growth, warns FSB

Prospective pension reforms could see small firms raise prices, cut jobs or slash profits, the Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) has warned.
New research looks at how the current rules relating to auto-enrolment are already piling cost and complexity onto small employers. It also exposes how possible changes expected in the second phase of the Government’s Pensions Review – due later this year – could heap much further pressure on small firms already dealing with soaring wage bills and mounting National Insurance contributions (NICs).
Most employers already say that decoding pension rules is a headache (53%), and a quarter (24%) are paying over £500 a year for advice – even before new changes are introduced.
Small employers want to do right by their staff – but 79 per cent are concerned about the rising cost of employment, and reforms must reflect that pressure.
FSB’s report, Backing the Future, lays bare the full impact of potential pension reforms being promoted by the Government.
If employer pension contributions were to double to six per cent, 92 per cent of small employers would have to change their business negatively to cope, raising prices (52%), recruiting fewer workers (38%), cutting profits or absorbing costs (34%), and reducing the number of employees (14%).
One of the proposals could see pension contributions applied from the very first pound earned, instead of the current £6,240.
This would see 82 per cent of small employers affected negatively, raising prices (36%), cutting profits or limiting earnings (32%), recruiting fewer workers (28%), reducing pensions to a minimum of three per cent (19%), and cancelling/scaling down plans for investing in the business (19%).
FSB is now calling for:
 
• Phase two of the Pensions Review to explicitly examine how workplace pension changes impact small employers and learn from how auto-enrolment has been rolled out until now. The review must look closely at the financial and admin burden on small businesses, including the cost of advice, running payroll, and getting to grips with the rules before bringing in any new proposals.
• Ministers to commission a full cross-cutting economic assessment before any changes to pension rules are made, which includes the impact of recent rises in National Insurance and the National Living Wage, to ensure small firms are not hit with unaffordable costs or forced into tough choices like raising prices or cutting jobs. Last November, the Labour Government said it would only make changes to auto-enrolment if the impact on businesses was fully considered.
• No changes be made to the earnings threshold, no increase to employer contributions and no lowering of the age limit before the economic assessment is complete.
• The Government to convene regulators, including The Pensions Regulator and the Financial Conduct Authority, and industry stakeholders, to simplify pension rules and provide clearer guidance for small employers, reducing complexity and unnecessary admin. This would be a pro-growth, pro-employment move.
• When considering pensions adequacy, the Government should look beyond just increasing contributions – considering scheme performance, investment returns and the real-world impact on small employers and employees. Poor fund performance leading to lower pensions later in life should not be masked by simplistic debates on contribution levels.
Tina McKenzie, policy chair of the Federation of Small Businesses, said: “Small business owners want to do the right thing. Entrepreneurs have taken on auto-enrolment, absorbed the costs, navigated the jargon, and kept paying into their staff’s pensions even when their own margins have fallen. But goodwill has limits.
“The more complex and expensive the system becomes, the more we risk pushing employers from willing participants into reluctant bystanders. If the Government wants pensions policy to succeed, it must prioritise clarity over complexity and provide the right support.
“This is not about resistance to pension reform, it’s about the cumulative burden of regulation and the rising cost of employment. Small firms are already feeling the pinch – NICs and wage increases are really taking their toll – and any new reforms could push many to breaking point. This is no time to add new burdens. Ministers should pause, take stock, and think carefully before stacking more costs on firms already under strain.
“Now, as phase two of the Pensions Review gets underway, the Government must ensure the real pressures facing small businesses are front and centre – no further changes should go ahead without proper protections in place.”

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this story on our news site - please take a moment to read this important message:

As you know, our aim is to bring you, the reader, an editorially led news site and magazine but journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them.

With the Covid-19 pandemichaving a major impact on our industry as a whole, the advertising revenues we normally receive, which helps us cover the cost of our journalists and this website, have been drastically affected.

As such we need your help. If you can support our news sites/magazines with either a small donation of even £1, or a subscription to our magazine, which costs just £31.50 per year, (inc p&P and mailed direct to your door) your generosity will help us weather the storm and continue in our quest to deliver quality journalism.

As a subscriber, you will have unlimited access to our web site and magazine. You'll also be offered VIP invitations to our events, preferential rates to all our awards and get access to exclusive newsletters and content.

Just click here to subscribe and in the meantime may I wish you the very best.








Latest news

Related news